Rayman 3D
- Thread starter Janic
- Start date
- Messages
- 10,163
- Tings
- 90,485
I'll just dump this here https://raymanpc.com/forum/posts/548663/
So it'll be like Pingu where they redub everything even if it's gibberish anyway haha.
So it'll be like Pingu where they redub everything even if it's gibberish anyway haha.
- Messages
- 12,392
- Tings
- 156,600
I was joking – the producer claimed that they had ‘polished the actors’, which makes no sense at all.Haruka said:
- Messages
- 41
- Tings
- 0
I wonder what brand of polish they use on actors? I could use some, my actors are always squeaky clean. 
- Messages
- 73
- Tings
- 365
Lol for this and for me quoting my own comment.ripa9 said:
ANYWAYZZ..
I was thinking about is the globox village in or not, and well a kinda stupid explanation for the missing purple lum popped up in my head:
It could make sence, that they "hid" it. If the developers are thinking like I am, those kind of mysteries (for the new players) shouldn't be shown so early in the game. Just imagine, if someone new to the series started off with this game, and on that part he would be completely annoyed of not knowing what is the flying purple ring that hits your face (3D effect) in the middle of a big empity area. He would be stuck on that until OoT is released and then he would forget the whole game.
Lol, not really, but at least he would start to doubt just a little more (already in doubt because of the reviews) that is the game any good.
Yeah, I like to talk a lot of crap
- Messages
- 33
- Tings
- 130
- Messages
- 268
- Tings
- 4,155
When they were reviewing the DSI-Ware port of Rayman 1, they began it with "Oh God. him."Haruka said:
Honestly, I do not know what they have against Rayman- granted, the continuous ports of his games have become a bit annoying (Rayman DS, anyone?) and the Rabbids have shoved him from the spotlight for about 5 years, but at least they should play his original games as they were meant to be played before making rash assumptions.
- Messages
- 10,163
- Tings
- 90,485
NGamer bashed the shit out of Travel in Time on the wii as well so I don't think it's only that.
I think you'll find that the first Rayman had a LOT of bullshit reviews even back in the day, solely due to the difficulty. This was before Ecco on the Dreamcast was made, now THAT is a rock hard game.
And you know how in most reviews they have "uppers and downers" - I remember a Dreamcast magazine that gave the game an 8 out of 10 which was good, but they put "Rayman's in it" as one of the downers. No.
I think you'll find that the first Rayman had a LOT of bullshit reviews even back in the day, solely due to the difficulty. This was before Ecco on the Dreamcast was made, now THAT is a rock hard game.
And you know how in most reviews they have "uppers and downers" - I remember a Dreamcast magazine that gave the game an 8 out of 10 which was good, but they put "Rayman's in it" as one of the downers. No.
- Messages
- 5,107
- Tings
- 55,260
I thought you said that it was decent.Haruka said:
- Messages
- 10,163
- Tings
- 90,485
It arrived
And it's better than I thought it'd be. Just gotta get used to staring directly into the top screen and using the thumb pad [controls are a *tiny* bit drunken but much better than Rayman DS], other than that it's pretty good. No freezes on me just yet like one person on NEOGAF said, and I can also confirm that it uses the ISLE OF DOORS.
I'm up to the Bayou right now.
And it's better than I thought it'd be. Just gotta get used to staring directly into the top screen and using the thumb pad [controls are a *tiny* bit drunken but much better than Rayman DS], other than that it's pretty good. No freezes on me just yet like one person on NEOGAF said, and I can also confirm that it uses the ISLE OF DOORS.
I'm up to the Bayou right now.
