Wtf, crusading? Lad, Las, Boy, Irish, you really need to take it for what it is and not get so stubborn and defensive over it. You could have simply said something along the lines of "Aye, I'm aware of the problem, but it's not something I care enough about to fix". Would that have been so difficult? Nay, and it certainly would've been both more constructive and brief than typing up these pointlessly long replies that explain very little to me.
My initial reply was literally that, with a little bit of my normal silliness injected in (that you complained there was no need for). Yet you still took it even further still. I'm not the stubborn one.
Please learn how to take jokes and sarcasm. I'm not being super defensive, just killing the discussion now, because if I ignored you, I don't doubt you would bring up the issue in another place where it is not related to the topic matter, or a place where other forum goers don't need to see it. If you can't register exaggeration as a form of simple (and admittedly somewhat cheap) humour during those times where I use it, then I apologise. I will try to keep that in mind in future posts directed towards you.
Also, I don't really care what topic I do this in, because never before has it taken up more than two posts: [Correction] -> [Oh lol thanks]
Your initial post on the matter stated that this is a thing I consistently do, which you are 100% correct in saying. So I simply made a post responding to this, and informing you of the fact it was a habit of mine (and I had some silliness in that post, though that was in good fun, and was not meant to insult you/get confrontational with you in the slightest, if you took it that way). I did not get defensive at all. But then you brought it further, and honestly, you had a bit of an unnecessary attitude and tone in your following post.
And just in general, people calling others out on minor grammatical errors, especially when a person explains it's a habit, or that they don't proof read, or that they might simply be genuinely below average with their grammar, etc, is generally seen as condescending, and disregarding another person's individuality. Especially on the internet, where people genuinely develop typing quirks and styles - and before you try to again deny that people have quirks and habits like this, and try to say that mine can't be one, read Homestuck, a really long, complex and deep web comic that literally uses typing quirks as a way to distinguish between characters, even if that's "not presentable" to some, or in normal, printed literature. Typing quirks, such as my own, can easily be considered a part of one's character, as much as an accent in one's voice can (because much like how typing quirks can lead people to consistent grammatical errors, accents lead people to consistently mispronounce words).
And while I know that in general, you care a lot about presentation in anything, possibly valuing it above all else with certain topics, not everyone does (for me personally, it depends on the topic). And they are not inferior or wrong for that. Most people who don't proof read are fully aware they might make little grammatical mistakes. Like I said before, I didn't get defensive when I responded. I simply explained my little habit that I can't seem to kick. There was no need for you to take it any further than that, and you still did. That's when it comes across as condescending, and implying that someone needs to change to suit your ideal image of the world. Calling me "a real bitch" only supports your condescending attitude even further.
And possibly the weirdest thing about this is that you made your off topic post here, linked me to it on ANOTHER topic, where it was still off topic, to get your point across. Not to mention the post of mine you referenced here was made a few days ago.
I'd rather this discussion be dropped entirely, as it's something I think should of been left at my response if it had to be brought up at all. But, if you are compelled to say more on this, do it via PM. I can't guarantee a response, but either way, this discussion does not need to be brought any further in this topic.
Now, back to talking about the real Rayman (fandom serket: I'm actually Raymesis, not Rayman :V).
