Rayman Optimum

technology4617 said:
Cometcourse64 said:
HOLY CRAP ITS FREAKING AWESOME I JUST INSTALLED IT AND DAAAAAAAMMMN
Wait for v1.22 with the HQ filters. ;)
Believe me the HQ filter will not look any sharper than supersai. SuperSai is just more blury so the pixels get more sharpened.
Btw. That wasn't his full post. Check my signature :hehe:
 
LOL i took off the betilla's rack thing because i figured it would be too dirty for what appears to be a clean forum, but im glad Eshomar got a kick out of it.
 
emshomar said:
I know but i think OpenGL will make it look even more sharper.
Unfortunately, when I use that type of OpenGL, the image appears at the ACTUAL SIZE.

The new config tool works fine, by the way.
 
Here is a screenshot outputted with DDraw:

And another one with OpenGL:

I think OpenGL does the job better than DDraw just by looking at Rayman.

technology4617 said:
The new config tool works fine, by the way.
While experimenting with it, I discovered a few little bugs that I just faced with and updated the link.
 
emshomar said:
I think OpenGL does the job better than DDraw just by looking at Rayman.
Hm. I didn't notice a difference when I tried the two, but, then again, I didn't have a side-by-side comparison.

emshomar said:
While experimenting with it, I discovered a few little bugs that I just faced with and updated the link.
Like what?
 
technology4617 said:
emshomar said:
I think OpenGL does the job better than DDraw just by looking at Rayman.
Hm. I didn't notice a difference when I tried the two, but, then again, I didn't have a side-by-side comparison.
I just started it with output DDraw with my Intel HD4000 and there is also a difference if I use the GTX660M instead and I can say it look better on my Intel HD4000 though. Oh and DDraw and OpenGL looks the same on my Intel HD4000, however my GTX660M gives another image that I am not confortable with.

technology4617 said:
emshomar said:
While experimenting with it, I discovered a few little bugs that I just faced with and updated the link.
Like what?
advinterp3x was entered incorrectly and it had a problem in detecting the window resolution 960x600.
 
emshomar said:
I just started it with output DDraw with my Intel HD4000 and there is also a difference if I use the GTX660M instead and I can say it look better on my Intel HD4000 though. Oh and DDraw and OpenGL looks the same on my Intel HD4000, however my GTX660M gives another image that I am not confortable with.
Though the GTX660M has worse filters than the Intel integrated graphics with the default settings, the card is still much better than the integrated graphics.
 
I have tweaked the configurator a little bit. The slowmotion fix stays locked until an outout had been chosen that occurs the slowmotion which is surface and ddraw in Windows8. Some scalers like super2xsai or hq2x/hq3x aren't compatible with opengl so I still have to tweak it in that way too later. Here is the updated one:
 
emshomar said:
I have tweaked the configurator a little bit. The slowmotion fix stays locked until an outout had been chosen that occurs the slowmotion which is surface and ddraw in Windows8. Some scalers like super2xsai or hq2x/hq3x aren't compatible with opengl so I still have to tweak it in that way too later. Here is the updated one:
Also, those scalers that appear on their original size also have the slowdown issue.

I tried to ask you this on Skype, but does the slow-motion fix setting just get locked, or does it get locked at the "off" setting? :P
 
technology4617 said:
I tried to ask you this on Skype, but does the slow-motion fix setting just get locked, or does it get locked at the "off" setting? :P
Strange I didn't get the message :? Only the button gets locked. You can still force it to by entering it yourself in the *.conf file.
 
emshomar said:
Strange I didn't get the message :? Only the button gets locked. You can still force it to by entering it yourself in the *.conf file.
If that's true, then couldn't it get locked at the "on" setting? :P
 
technology4617 said:
emshomar said:
Strange I didn't get the message :? Only the button gets locked. You can still force it to by entering it yourself in the *.conf file.
If that's true, then couldn't it get locked at the "on" setting? :P
If it was checked before and gets locked by application the check will get automatically off.
 
Back
Top