Category talk:Aquatic creatures: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Hunchman801 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shall Céloche and the Hoodlum watercraft be included in this category? Both are arguably creatures – it's very difficult to draw the line between a Hoodlum and his vehicle, as the Black Lum is the only living part. The rest is only an apparatus, and we've never seen any Hoodlum piloting either of these vehicles – Céloche and the watercraft could quite easily be 'suits' controlled by the Black Lums within, just like the Hoodmongers or any other Hoodlum. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 16:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | Shall Céloche and the Hoodlum watercraft be included in this category? Both are arguably creatures – it's very difficult to draw the line between a Hoodlum and his vehicle, as the Black Lum is the only living part. The rest is only an apparatus, and we've never seen any Hoodlum piloting either of these vehicles – Céloche and the watercraft could quite easily be 'suits' controlled by the Black Lums within, just like the Hoodmongers or any other Hoodlum. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 16:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
:I can say that's a plausible argument. Why not? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 17:51, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | :I can say that's a plausible argument. Why not? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 17:51, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
:In the absence of any proof indicating the presence of a Black Lum, I don't think they should. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png|link=User:Hunchman801]] 14:02, 19 March 2011 (UTC) | |||