Talk:Bad Rayman: Difference between revisions

Line 80:

::::::I also go for the second option. There isn't much we can do. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 00:30, 11 September 2013 (CEST)

:::::::So, we're keeping Raymesis as Bad Rayman. So, should I or someone else make another Dark Rayman page solely for the Legend's iteration?--[[User:Master|Master]] ([[User talk:Master|talk]]) 21:23, 2 October 2013 (CEST)

:::::::It isn't that hard to figure out. He's just a filler. Raymesis is clearly not Dark Rayman because Dark Rayman is in the game (Also, we clarified that Dark Rayman is named "Dark Rayman" in Origins, and not "DarkRay". This is supported by the fact that he's named "Dark Rayman" in Jungle Run's DLC, and that Polokus calls Rayman "Ray", so it makes sense for him to call Dark Rayman "DarkRay"). HOWEVER.... If Raymesis deserves an article or not... err, that should be decided with more clarity. I think it's okay to simply contain Raymesis as a little portion of Dark Rayman's article, since there's little to no story about him, and he's just an excuse to make Dark Rayman still playable. Opinions?--[[User:Sergiomonty|Sergiomonty]] ([[User talk:Sergiomonty|talk]]) 08:20, 3 October 2013 (CEST)

@@ Line 80: / Line 80: @@
 ::::::I also go for the second option. There isn't much we can do. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 00:30, 11 September 2013 (CEST)
 :::::::So, we're keeping Raymesis as Bad Rayman. So, should I or someone else make another Dark Rayman page solely for the Legend's iteration?--[[User:Master|Master]] ([[User talk:Master|talk]]) 21:23, 2 October 2013 (CEST)
+:::::::It isn't that hard to figure out. He's just a filler. Raymesis is clearly not Dark Rayman because Dark Rayman is in the game (Also, we clarified that Dark Rayman is named "Dark Rayman" in Origins, and not "DarkRay". This is supported by the fact that he's named "Dark Rayman" in Jungle Run's DLC, and that Polokus calls Rayman "Ray", so it makes sense for him to call Dark Rayman "DarkRay"). HOWEVER.... If Raymesis deserves an article or not... err, that should be decided with more clarity. I think it's okay to simply contain Raymesis as a little portion of Dark Rayman's article, since there's little to no story about him, and he's just an excuse to make Dark Rayman still playable. Opinions?--[[User:Sergiomonty|Sergiomonty]] ([[User talk:Sergiomonty|talk]]) 08:20, 3 October 2013 (CEST)