Talk:RayWiki: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Spiraldoor (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::::(...I still think we should do this.) —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 18:19, 28 September 2011 (UTC) | ::::(...I still think we should do this.) —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 18:19, 28 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::::So your idea is to create more subcategories in order to avoid a flood of links? If it is that, I agree. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 18:33, 28 September 2011 (UTC) | :::::So your idea is to create more subcategories in order to avoid a flood of links? If it is that, I agree. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 18:33, 28 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::::I don't want to create ''more'' subcategories – I think we have enough already. I want us to stop grouping articles in gargantuan super-categories like 'Characters' (94 pages) and 'Enemies' (126 pages). By way of comparison, Wikipedia's '[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:People People]' category contains a tree of many subcategories, but no individual articles. This is what I'm suggesting. If Wikipedia followed the system we currently use, there would be hundreds of redundant categories at the end of almost every single article – it's just not efficient. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 18:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Languages == | == Languages == | ||