Talk:Psychlops: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
Since the Rayman book reveals that these were about to be included in Rayman 2, is it ok to put the Psychlops in the Scrapped Rayman 2 content and Creatures from Rayman 2 categories even though we do not have any visual material from this era? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 22:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Since the Rayman book reveals that these were about to be included in Rayman 2, is it ok to put the Psychlops in the Scrapped Rayman 2 content and Creatures from Rayman 2 categories even though we do not have any visual material from this era? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 22:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
:I suppose it makes sense, yeah. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]] 04:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
:I suppose it makes sense, yeah. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]] 04:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
::Hey, you have a bad memory, Hunch!
::Last month, Hunch discovers that although Michaël Janod says that he gives his name to the Psychlops in the ''Rayman 2'' chapter of ''L'Histoire de Rayman'', he actually speaks about the development of ''Rayman Origins''. That's that the paragraph's form suggests.
::So the Psychlops aren't scrapped creatures from ''Rayman 2''.--[[User:Boomboleros7|Boomboleros7]] 14:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Return to "Psychlops" page.