Talk:Crowned Teensie
Crowned Teensies and Grand Minimus
It seems to be that they are the same. The fact that this article was created by Dreyfus2006, who made up quite a lot of stuff around here, doesn't help. —
12:45, 10 April 2014 (CEST)
- I believe the Grand Minimus are simply the ones who run the stone circles/Hall of Doors/Heart of the World, and the rest are all just normal ones with crowns. --iHeckler9
18:45, 10 April 2014 (CEST)
- The heart of the matter really lies in whether or not such a distinction is made between the two in official material. I don't recall seeing any material implying as such, but I'm not wholly sure. --
19:26, 10 April 2014 (CEST) - Well, it is a possibility but yet I can't find an evidence that both are the same thing. I'm not even sure if Grand Minimus is simply the name of the king or if it is a ranking name for a crowned Teensie. More thoughts? --
Haruka 15:50, 11 April 2014 (CEST)
- I've never heard about "Crowned Teensies" in any official source.
- The heart of the matter really lies in whether or not such a distinction is made between the two in official material. I don't recall seeing any material implying as such, but I'm not wholly sure. --
- Before the release of Rayman 3, there was that official text on a French website:
- "Les Grands Minis représentent un ordre particulier au sein de la population Ptizêtre. Ils sont chargés de garder le Cœur du Monde, qui rassemble toute l'énergie de la Croisée des Rêves."
- Translation:
- "The Grand Minimus form a particular order in the Teensie population. They guard the Heart of the World, which gathers all the energy of the Glade of Dreams."
- Apparently, the Teensies with green and purple clothes are Grand Minimus. They form a "tribe", just like the Sylkins or the Nookins. —Boomboleros7 19:52, 11 April 2014 (CEST)
- So in short, all the Teensies we see in Rayman 2 are Grand Minimus? It sounds strange but if it is what the pre-R3 details hint... -- Haruka 00:35, 12 April 2014 (CEST)
- So in short, all the Teensies we see in Rayman 2 are Grand Minimus? It sounds strange but if it is what the pre-R3 details hint... --
- There doesn't seem to be any material in favour of this distinction here, the article itself does concede that it involves conjecture, not a very strong stance for it to be as is, from what I'm seeing. -- 00:50, 12 April 2014 (CEST)
- There doesn't seem to be any material in favour of this distinction here, the article itself does concede that it involves conjecture, not a very strong stance for it to be as is, from what I'm seeing. --
- Se wo agree that this should be merged with the Grand Minimus article. — 11:13, 15 April 2014 (CEST)
- Se wo agree that this should be merged with the Grand Minimus article. —
- You have my approval. -- Haruka 01:10, 16 April 2014 (CEST)
- You have my approval. --
- I see no argument justifying a stay of merging, let it be done -- 01:30, 16 April 2014 (CEST)
- I see no argument justifying a stay of merging, let it be done --
- I think it should be merged too.—Boomboleros7 02:26, 16 April 2014 (CEST)
- So...I think we're ready to merge, right?-- 00:22, 6 May 2014 (CEST)
- So...I think we're ready to merge, right?--
- Done. Please see Talk:Grand Minimus for another matter that occurred to me. — 11:23, 6 May 2014 (CEST)
- Done. Please see Talk:Grand Minimus for another matter that occurred to me. —