Category talk:Speedrunning: Difference between revisions

From RayWiki, the Rayman wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Master (talk | contribs)
m Hunchman801 moved page Talk:Speedrunning to Category talk:Speedrunning
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:


::Congratulations, though why you felt the need to start a talk page simply for that is beyond me, talk pages are for discussion of the topic, not for noting down edits. What you've written is what should be put in the edit summary, seen at the bottom of the edit form. --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png|150px|link=User:Master]] 21:38, 15 June 2014 (CEST)
::Congratulations, though why you felt the need to start a talk page simply for that is beyond me, talk pages are for discussion of the topic, not for noting down edits. What you've written is what should be put in the edit summary, seen at the bottom of the edit form. --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png|150px|link=User:Master]] 21:38, 15 June 2014 (CEST)
== Splitting ==
I suggest that ''Rayman 3'' glitches be given their own article. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png|link=User:Hunchman801]] 20:16, 17 June 2014 (CEST)
:I concur, I had planned to posit such a suggestion myself, once this article was sufficiently built. I wonder if any of the current editors of this article have any objections? --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png|150px|link=User:Master]] 20:21, 17 June 2014 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 18:10, 18 February 2021

Fixed 'External links' section

Hello,

I've separated the two links ('Rayman 1' and 'Rayman 3 scores').

-- Fifo (talk) 21:23, 15 June 2014 (CEST)

Congratulations, though why you felt the need to start a talk page simply for that is beyond me, talk pages are for discussion of the topic, not for noting down edits. What you've written is what should be put in the edit summary, seen at the bottom of the edit form. -- 21:38, 15 June 2014 (CEST)

Splitting

I suggest that Rayman 3 glitches be given their own article. — 20:16, 17 June 2014 (CEST)

I concur, I had planned to posit such a suggestion myself, once this article was sufficiently built. I wonder if any of the current editors of this article have any objections? -- 20:21, 17 June 2014 (CEST)