Talk:Anti-RaymanZone Organization: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Spiraldoor (talk | contribs) Created page with '==Not sure about this== I don't know how comfortable I feel about giving these guys an article all to themselves. Their connection to Rayman is tenuous, and I don't think they de...' |
Hunchman801 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Not sure about this== | ==Not sure about this== | ||
I don't know how comfortable I feel about giving these guys an article all to themselves. Their connection to Rayman is tenuous, and I don't think they deserve the attention or publicity of their own permanent page. It would be better to just mention them in the RaymanZone article – there isn't even much to say about them. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] 18:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC) | I don't know how comfortable I feel about giving these guys an article all to themselves. Their connection to Rayman is tenuous, and I don't think they deserve the attention or publicity of their own permanent page. It would be better to just mention them in the RaymanZone article – there isn't even much to say about them. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] 18:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
: Well those red links were bothering me, and there's actually a lot more to say. Not that it's going to be one of our most important articles, but I'd rather have one about pretty much everything. Whether they deserve it is not relevant towards the creation of such an article anyway. In conclusion, I'll just say it's no harm keeping it. —[[User:Hunchman801|Hunchman801]] 14:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:20, 21 January 2011
Not sure about this
I don't know how comfortable I feel about giving these guys an article all to themselves. Their connection to Rayman is tenuous, and I don't think they deserve the attention or publicity of their own permanent page. It would be better to just mention them in the RaymanZone article – there isn't even much to say about them. —Spiraldoor 18:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Well those red links were bothering me, and there's actually a lot more to say. Not that it's going to be one of our most important articles, but I'd rather have one about pretty much everything. Whether they deserve it is not relevant towards the creation of such an article anyway. In conclusion, I'll just say it's no harm keeping it. —Hunchman801 14:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC)