Talk:Psychlops: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Hunchman801 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::So the Psychlops aren't scrapped creatures from ''Rayman 2''.--[[User:Boomboleros7|Boomboleros7]] 14:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC) | ::So the Psychlops aren't scrapped creatures from ''Rayman 2''.--[[User:Boomboleros7|Boomboleros7]] 14:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::So this this means it was a mistake? Ah man. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 15:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC) | :::So this this means it was a mistake? Ah man. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 15:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
::::You're right, I had already forgotten. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]] 15:03, 9 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:03, 9 April 2017
Categories
Since the Rayman book reveals that these were about to be included in Rayman 2, is it ok to put the Psychlops in the Scrapped Rayman 2 content and Creatures from Rayman 2 categories even though we do not have any visual material from this era? --
Haruka
22:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- I suppose it makes sense, yeah. —


04:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hey, you have a bad memory, Hunch!
- Last month, Hunch discovers that although Michaël Janod says that he gives his name to the Psychlops in the Rayman 2 chapter of L'Histoire de Rayman, he actually speaks about the development of Rayman Origins. That's that the paragraph's form suggests.
- So the Psychlops aren't scrapped creatures from Rayman 2.--Boomboleros7 14:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- So this this means it was a mistake? Ah man. --
Haruka
15:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- So this this means it was a mistake? Ah man. --